<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Benchmark on Searchless.ai Blog - AI Visibility &amp; Searchless Optimization</title><link>https://blog.searchless.ai/tags/benchmark/</link><description>Recent content in Benchmark on Searchless.ai Blog - AI Visibility &amp; Searchless Optimization</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.157.0</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 08:30:00 +0200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.searchless.ai/tags/benchmark/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>AI Citation Volatility Benchmark 2026: Why 50% Decay in 13 Weeks Is the New Normal</title><link>https://blog.searchless.ai/posts/2026-04-17-ai-citation-volatility-benchmark-2026-citation-decay-half-life/</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 08:30:00 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://blog.searchless.ai/posts/2026-04-17-ai-citation-volatility-benchmark-2026-citation-decay-half-life/</guid><description>Amsive&amp;#39;s finding that 50% of content cited in AI search is less than 13 weeks old is the most important benchmark in GEO. It means AI visibility is not a set-and-forget game. It is a freshness-and-structure game where citations decay faster than traditional backlinks.</description></item></channel></rss>